Effects Of Consumer Goods And Industrial Products Standard On Export Diversification In South Africa

Effects Of Consumer Goods And Industrial Products Standard On Export Diversification In South Africa

Authors

  • D. Afolabi 2Department of Project Management Technology, The Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria
  • O. P. Ologunwa Department of Project Management Technology, The Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria
  • O. O. Simon-Oke Department of Securities and Investments Management Technology, The Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51459/jostir.2025.1.2.0147

Keywords:

European Union, Product Standards, Consumer Goods, Industrial Products

Abstract

The initial stages of economic development are generally characterized by rising per capita income alongside structural changes in both production and export activities. These changes often entail the development of new products and the establishment of additional trade partnerships, thereby fostering broader diversification within the economy. This study therefore, examined the effect of consumer goods and industrial products standard on export diversification in South Africa. The study employed Generalized Least Square (GLS) Model which estimated the effect of European Union (EU) product standards and the harmonized EU product standard (EU_ISO). Data used for the analysis were from year 2011 to 2022, and were sourced from WIT-TRAINS, and WDI. The results revealed that the distance and common language were positive and significantly affects countries ceramic (ED_CER) export diversification (P = 0.000; 0.001). However, the effect of distance on ceramic (ED_CER) was stronger than its effect on sugar & confectionary (ED_SUC).  This implies that the farther away the countries are from each other, the larger the export basket and that export diversifications are not only driven by standards requirements but by language and distance. The EU standard positively affected both sugar & confectionary and ceramic export diversification (P = 0.941; P = 0.638). This indicates that a one per cent increase in the EU product standard results into 0.9 and 0.6 per cent increase in sugar & confectionary and ceramic export diversification. The result also revealed that the EU standards that are harmonized with ISO standards are positive (P = 0.465) on South Africa’s sugar & confectionary export diversification.  The study concludes that South Africa’s export diversification and the harmonization of the EU to international standards acts have beneficial factors even when the overall impact of product standards was positive but insignificant. The study recommends that the development of infrastructure should be given importance as it leads to reduction in transaction cost (distance) of trade.

References

Espoir LM, Benjamin MM, Amantha MM (2021) The influence of export diversification on economic growth: A case of Southern African Development Community (SADC). American Journal of Industrial and Business Management.11(7); 52-76

Espoir, L. M. (2020). Determinant of export diversification: An empirical analysis in the case of SADC countries. Research in journal Business & Social Science, 130-144.

European Commission, (2000) “Guide to the implementation of directives based on the new approach and the global approach http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/ newapproach/newapproach.htm

Hoekman, B (2007) “Doha, development, and discrimination.” Pacific Economic Review 12(3), 267-292.

Karahan, H. (2017). Export diversification in emerging economies. In U. Hacioglu & H. Dincer (Eds.), Journal of Global financial crisis and its ramifications on capital markets, 3(1), 287–296).

Kareem O. (2010) The effects of market access conditions on Africa’s exports. An unpublished Ph.D thesis. Faculty of the Social Sciences, University of Ibadan, Nigeria

IMF (2014) Companion volume to the international monetary fund’s annual report 2014. Annual report 2014 web page (www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/ar/2014/eng).

ISO (2020) International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2020). ISO 31000 Risk Management. https://www.iso.org/iso-31000-risk-management.html

Lopez-Calix, Jose R. (2020). Leveraging export diversification in fragile countries: The emerging value chains of Mali, Chad, Niger, and Guinea. International Development in Focus;. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/33259

Mora, J., & Olabisi, M. (2023). Economic development and export diversification: The role of trade costs. International Journal of Economics, 173, 102–118 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2022.11.002

Nham, N. T. H., Bao, N. K. Q., & Ha, L. T. (2023). Nonlinear effects of digitalization on export activities: an empirical investigation in European countries. Journal of Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(3), 1041–1079.

Orebiyi P. A. & Ubong Edem Effiong (2023) Export Diversification, Financial Sector Development and Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence from West African Sub-Region Studies in Economics and Business Relations Journal. 4(2), 13 – 36

Osakwe, P. N., & Kilolo, J. M. (2018). What drives export diversification? New evidence from A panel of developing countries (UNCTAD Research). Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ser-rp-2018d3_en.pd

Shepherd B. (2009) Product standards and export diversification. Journal of Economic Integration. 2(4);300-333.

Rogneda V.; Alina U. & Valentin V., (2025). Determinant of export diversification: The case of Eastern European Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, 63(2), 260-296,

Tinbergen, J. (1962). An analysis of world trade flows. Shaping the world economy, 3, 1-117.https://doi.org/10.1002/tie.5060050113

UNCTAD (2023). The world economic growth to slow from 3% in 2022 to 2.4% in 2023 Report Projects (UNCTAD/TDR/2023)

UNCTAD (2024). African economies and resilience to trade risks. UN trade and Development. (UNCTAD 2024).

Vogel, T. (2022). Structural and policy determinants of export diversification in Africa: A bilateral panel approach using Bayesian Model Averaging. A Background paper commissioned by the UNCTAD secretariat for the 2022 edition of the Economic Development in Africa Report.

Yusuf, E & Sancar C. (2021) The impact of export dynamics on trade balance in emerging and developed countries: An evaluation with middle income trap perspective. International Review of Economics & Finance 76(4):357–375

Downloads

Published

2025-11-01

How to Cite

Afolabi, D., Ologunwa, O. P., & Simon-Oke, O. O. (2025). Effects Of Consumer Goods And Industrial Products Standard On Export Diversification In South Africa. Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation Research, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.51459/jostir.2025.1.2.0147

Issue

Section

Articles
Loading...