Strength Performance of Different Lightweight Concrete
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51459/jostir.2025.1.Special-Issue.0104Keywords:
Lightweight concrete, Pumice, Polystyrene, palm kernel````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` shell, Strength performanceAbstract
This study investigates the strength performance of different lightweight concretes using polystyrene, palm kernel shell, and pumice as replacements for traditional coarse aggregates in a consistent 1:2:4 mix ratio. Lightweight concrete offers potential advantages in reducing structural weight while maintaining adequate strength for various applications. A control mix of regular concrete with the same 1:2:4 ratio was prepared to serve as a benchmark. The mechanical properties of both the lightweight and control concretes were evaluated through compressive, tensile, and flexural strength tests at curing periods of 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. In addition, workability was assessed using slump tests, while water absorption tests were performed to evaluate porosity. The findings demonstrated that the lightweight aggregates considerably decreased the density of the concrete to values within the lightweight concrete range (1402–1979 kg/m³), as opposed to normal concrete density of not less than 2400 kg/m³. Pumice was the most effective lightweight aggregate overall, with a compressive strength of 11.22 MPa at 28 days (about 70% of the control) and improved flexural and tensile strength in comparison to other lightweight mixes. Although polystyrene demonstrated the lowest structural performance (2.05 MPa at 28 days), it gave exceptional moisture resistance and intermediate strength (6.30 MPa at 28 days) compared to palm kernel shell. The high porosity of pumice (15%), the low absorption of polystyrene (0.3%), and the intermediate value of palm kernel shell (8%), was all highlighted by water absorption tests. According to the results, polystyrene is a good lightweight aggregate for non-structural or insulating applications, palm kernel shell is recommended for moderate-strength, sustainable applications, and pumice is recommended for applications where strength and weight reduction must be balanced. Granite is still the best material for strong structural components.
References
British Standards Institution. (2009). BS EN 12390-7:2009: Testing hardened concrete – Part 7: Density of hardened concrete. BSI Standards Limited.
British Standards Institution. (2013). BS EN 206:2013+A1:2016: Concrete — Specification, performance, production and conformity. BSI Standards Limited.
BS 1881-122: 2011: Testing concrete. Part 122: method for determination of water absorption (2011). BSI: London, UK
BS EN 12390-3:2009 Testing hardened concrete. compressive strength of test specimens, British Standards Institution, London, UK.
BS EN 12390-6:2009. Testing hardened concrete. tensile splitting strength test, BSI: London, UK
Casanovas-Rubio, M., & Ramos, G. (2017). Decision-making tool for the assessment and selection of construction processes based on environmental criteria: Application to precast and cast-in-situ alternatives. Resources, conservation and recycling, 126, 107-117, DOI:10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.035
Chung, J. K., Han, S. J., & Kim, Y. J. (2017). Effect of grading of lightweight aggregates on the properties of concrete. Construction and Building Materials, 135, 239-248.
El Gamal, S., Al-Jardani, Y., Meddah, M. S., Abu Sohel, K., & Al-Saidy, A. (2024). Mechanical and thermal properties of lightweight concrete with recycled expanded polystyrene beads. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering, 28(1), 80-94.
Elsherbiny, A. (2023). Utilization of steel and polypropylene fibers in lightweight concrete beams made from crushed clay bricks. Journal of Building Engineering, 52, 104182.
EN 1992 Eurocode 2; Design of Concrete Structures—Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2013.
Graybeal, B. A. (2013). Lightweight concrete: Mechanical properties. FHWA Publications, FHWA-HRT-13-062.
Konitufe, C., Abubakar, A. L. I. Y. U., & Baba, A. S. (2023). Influence of aggregate size and shape on the compressive strength of concrete. Construction, 3(1), 15-22.
Kumar, A. D., Poluraju, P., & Kasagani, H. (2022). Experimental investigation on mechanical properties of lightweight aggregate concrete. Civil and Environmental Engineering, 18(2), 666-677.
Kumar, V. K., Priya, A. K., Manikandan, G., Naveen, A. S., Nitishkumar, B., & Pradeep, P. (2021). Review of materials used in lightweight concrete. Materials Today Proceedings, 37(2), 3538-3539.
Prasittisopin, L., Termkhajornkit, P., & Kim, Y. H. (2022). Review of concrete with expanded polystyrene (EPS): Performance and environmental aspects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 366, 132919.
Rumsys, J., Zilinskas, J., & Vaitkus, S. (2018). Compressive strength and durability of structural lightweight concrete containing fine expanded glass aggregates. Construction and Building Materials, 174, 574-582.
Šeputytė-Jucikė, M., Šlekys, G., & Šlekienė, A. (2023). Performance characteristics of lightweight concrete made from expanded glass and crushed expanded polystyrene. Construction and Building Materials, 272, 121200.
Shafiq, M. S., Khan, F. A., Badrashi, Y. I., Khan, F. A., Fahim, M., Abbas, A., & Adil, W. (2021). Evaluation of mechanical properties of lightweight concrete with pumice aggregate. Advances in Science and Technology. Research Journal, 15(2), 30-38.
Shah, S. J., Naeem, A., Hejazi, F., Mahar, W. A., & Haseeb, A. (2024). Experimental investigation of mechanical properties of concrete mix with lightweight expanded polystyrene and steel fibers. CivilEng, 5(1), 209-223.
Sobuz, M. H. R., Islam, M. S., Akid, A. S. M., Datta, S. D., Alahmari, T. S., Hasan, N. M. S., ... & Aditto, F. S. (2023). Mechanical properties and flexural response of palm shell aggregate lightweight reinforced concrete beam. Sustainability, 15(22), 15783.
Spiesz, P., & Kijowski, J. (2013). Development of cement-based lightweight composites: A review of durability-related properties. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 25(6), 682-690.
Torkaman, J., Ashori, A., & Momtazi, A. (2014). Using wood fiber waste, rice husk ash, and limestone powder waste as cement replacement materials for lightweight concrete blocks. Construction and Building Materials, 50, 432-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.09.044
Tuncer, M., Bideci, A., Çomak, B., Durmuş, G., & Sallı Bideci, Ö. (2025). Experimental investigation of durability properties of polymer coated pumice aggregate lightweight concretes. Polymers, 17(2), 253.
Upasiri, R., Ratnayake, R., & Karunaratne, D. (2021). Fire performance of lightweight concrete made with pumice aggregates. Fire Safety Journal, 118, 103209.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.