Effect of Different Improvers on Gluten-Free Cassava Bread For Enhanced Sensory Attributes, Physical Quality and Proximate Composition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51459/jostir.2025.1.Special-Issue.056Keywords:
Gluten-free, cassava, bread, sensory, proximate and physical propertiesAbstract
The search for substitute flours and useful additives to mimic the characteristics of wheat-based bread has been spurred by the growing demand for gluten-free goods. This study assessed the impact of many hydrocolloid improvers, including carboxymethyl, gelatin, and psyllium husk. cellulose (CMC) and xanthan gum (XAG)—on the physical attributes, sensory attributes, and approximate composition of bread made using premium cassava flour (HQCF). The cassava sample used for this study was sourced from the National Root Crops Research Institute Umudike. Standard bread-making procedures were applied, after which analysis on sensory evaluation, physical quality and proximate composition were was conducted using a 20-member panel on a 9-point hedonic scale, vernier caliper and standard laboratory chemicals respectively. A wheat-based positive control (WPC) and a cassava-based negative control (CNC) were used for comparison. Results showed that bread samples with improvers exhibited varied sensory outcomes, with PSH-enhanced bread, scoring highest in texture (6.40), taste (6.10), chewiness (6.50), and overall acceptability (6.50) among the gluten-free variants, followed by CMC. GET and XAG showed moderate to low sensory acceptance. The physical parameter showed that the height, length, width and weight ranged from 8.34 to 9.58, 14.87 to 16.86, 9.33 to 73 and 471 to 598, respectively. The result showed that among the improved bread samples, samples CMS and PSH increased the height and width of the bread, while sample XAN had a low value in all physical parameters investigated. The study concludes that hydrocolloid improvers can significantly enhance the sensory attributes and physical parameters of gluten-free cassava bread, making it a viable alternative to wheat-based bread, particularly for individuals with gluten intolerance or celiac disease
References
Breshears, K. L., & Crowe, K. M. (2013). Sensory and textural evaluation of gluten-free bread substituted with amaranth and Montina™ flour. Journal of Food Research, 2(4), 1–10
Day, L. (2011). Wheat gluten: production, properties and application. In Handbook of food proteins (pp. 267-288). Woodhead Publishing.
Ficco, D. B., Mastrangelo, A. M., Trono, D., Borrelli, G. M., De Vita, P., Fares, C., and Papa, R. (2014). The colours of durum wheat: a review. Crop and Pasture Science, 65(1), 1-15.
Ganga, S., Mathiyoli, P. M., and Naachimuthu, K. P. (2020). Dark side of the white flour-Maida. Indian Journal of Health & Wellbeing, 11.
Hassoun, A., Jagtap, S., Garcia-Garcia, G., Trollman, H., Pateiro, M., Lorenzo, J. M., and Câmara, J. S. (2023). Food quality4 4.0: From traditional approaches to digitalized automated analysis. Journal of Food Engineering, 337, 111216.
Lazaridou, A., Duta, D., Papageorgiou, M., Belc, N., & Biliaderis, C. G. (2007). Effects of hydrocolloids on dough rheology and bread quality parameters in gluten-free formulations. Journal of food engineering, 79(3), 1033-1047
Muna, S. N., Akmalia, D., Noviasari, S., Safriani, N., & Muzaifa, M. (2024, June). Effect of hydrocolloid type on physicochemical and sensory characteristics of gluten-free white bread. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 1356, No. 1, p. 012018). IOP Publishing.
Olakanmi, S. J., Jayas, D. S., & Paliwal, J. (2023). Applications of imaging systems for the assessment of quality characteristics of bread and other baked goods: A review. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 22(3), 1817-1838.
Rosell, C. M., Benedito, C., & Galotto, M. J. (2004). Different hydrocolloids as bread improvers and antistaling agents. Food hydrocolloids, 18(2), 241-247.
Rybicka, I., Doba,K., AND Binczak, O.(2019). Improving the sensory and nutritional value of gluten-free bread. International Journal of Food Science and Technology, 54(9), 2661- 2667.
Sengar, R. S. (2022). Cassava processing and its food application: A review. Pharma Innov. J, 2, 415-422.
Sharanagat, V. S., Singh, L., & Nema, P. K. (2022). Approaches for development of functional and low gluten bread from sorghum: A review. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, 46(11), e17089
Smyth, M. C. (2017). Intestinal permeability and autoimmune diseases. Bioscience Horizons: The International Journal of Student Research, 10, hzx015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Science, Technology and Innovation Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.